Unversial Key
I recall from library school the comfort of having a single key to the door rather than a ring full of jangling id/passwords to remember. I preferred working in the comfort of my home. I seem to recall finding it distasteful and bothersome to have to share space with strangers. Plus I could research in my jammies, bathrobe and Spongebob house shoes (don't laugh).
This could make the gate keeping an easier job. But I wonder what problems may occur from it as well. Not to be a naysayer or Cassandra.
The product is especially popular with academic libraries, since it enables users to connect to all the institution’s licensed databases remotely from their own computers via a single authorized login maintained by the subscribing facilities.
That makes librarians the door man, but not the locksmith, which will remain under the control of the OCLC. One of the benefits will be that its creator Chris Zager will be taking on a year long stint as consultant to the OCLC. Eventually, says officials of the OCLC, it will be used in authentication in its WorldCat databases, too.
It will have its biggest impact on remote learners who cannot get to facilities and often require service from information professionals when the library is closed.
This is good. It has been a while since I used WorldCat. My memories of it were that it had its flaws. I hope that it is a developing and growing service just like any other search engine. Some times we are too fussy. Anyway this will change the game play a bit, I assume.
Any thoughts?
Here is the link to the story:
http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6527037.html
Wednesday, January 30, 2008
Tuesday, January 29, 2008
Paper Chasing
Take a Good Look
Yesterday I was in a book shop on Clark street and Wells (here in Chicago) and was looking at the high stacks and thinking about the books all around me. I thought, even in a hundred years I couldn't read all of these books. (Not that it was a big book shop, it just had too many books.) So I set aside the daunting purpose of their place here and now and drifted into deep thought about the packaging. Most of these books will end up in a landfill or will wisely be recycled. That is a comfort to someone who loves them just a little less than the planet which provided the materials to make them. That is, the ink, the wood pulp, and the carbon based bipeds who first wrote, edited, and published them.
I asked the owner of the shop, a worn man in his early sixties (his face looks as if it were a painting by Guiseppe Arcimboldo) if he knew what the oldest book was in his shop is and he rolled his eyes and said "How the hell should I know that?" He then returned to his work. This guy is old school all the way. He doesn't even use a register. He has a cigar box. He figures the tax out in his head. So I went back to poking around. My reason for asking was that I wanted to see a book printed in the old way from linen or some rag stock paper, with fine leather cover for example.
Two weeks before I had been reading about the development of paper and how in the mid 19Th century paper manufactures went from using finer more sturdy pulp of cloth like fibers to wood pulp. Everyone knows that newsprint (the paper that gets its name from it being most commonly used by news papers) is full of acids that over time yellow and break down the fibers of the paper. But early on in the beginning of its processing history the demand came when more and more people were learning to read and write. The invention of a reliable fountain pen (or reservoir pen as it was called then) also spurred a demand for cheap paper. This, along with the steam engine, and the Fourdrinier press, made such paper in the beginning possible.
Much of the early paper made from wood pulp contained significant amounts of alum, a variety of aluminum sulfate salts that are significantly acidic. Alum was added to paper to assist in sizing the paper,[6] making it somewhat water resistant so that inks did not "run" or spread uncontrollably. The early paper makers did not realize that the alum they added liberally to cure almost every problem encountered in making their product would eventually be detrimental.[4] The cellulose fibers which make up paper are hydrolyzed by acid, and the presence of alum would eventually degrade the fibers until the paper disintegrated in a process which has come to be known as "slow fire". Documents written on rag paper were significantly more stable. The use of non-acidic additives to make paper is becoming more prevalent and the stability of these papers is less of an issue.
Paper made from mechanical pulp contains significant amounts of lignin, a major component in wood. In the presence of light and oxygen lignin reacts to give yellow materials, which is why newsprint and other mechanical paper yellows with age. Paper made from bleached kraft or sulfite pulps does not contain significant amounts of lignin and is therefore better suited for books, documents and other applications where whiteness of the paper is essential.
This is all very basic description borrowed from a link below. The science behind it (chemistry) is something I am not good at appreciating. I do have a fondness for anything that lasts a long time. It fascinates me to consider that some paper in the right conditions can survive a very long time. In fact newspaper newsprint from the early part of the 20TH century have been discovered in landfills and other situations where it was buried, and the paper was in remarkable condition. The secret is to keep it out of sunlight. Sunlight is a powerful corrosive. (For people, too).
So I wanted to see something other than the wood pulp that I have known (and only known) my whole life. Trouble is, that is all there is. In the west before wood paper there were two chief candidates (other than clay tablets) for recording thought. One was the Egyptian Papyrus (a fiber derived from a plant called the papyrus plant (duh!) and the Greek solution of parchment or vellum, which was commonly made from sheep or calf's skin. (Uck!). The stuff has a long shelf life though. Think about the Dead Sea Scrolls for example. Granted they were stored in a desert in a cave (and out of the sun!) and held in clay pots.
Paper making is said to go back to China in the 2ND century where inspired by wasps, the Han Dynasty Chinese court official Cai Lun is widely regarded to have invented the modern method of paper making. He must have gotten tired of using silk, bone, and bamboo.
But try and get parchment, or papyrus on Clark Street and they look at you like you are nuts. So I ponder the depth of fortune of sunlight, landfills, dumb luck and careful stinginess of ancient looking booksellers.
Wondrous. That is what I come to in the end. The act of reading on crumbly old cheep novels and on dirty daily rags is no less noble than on the finest silk or parchment. A shepherd boy may fling a rock into a cave and discover lost texts of the Bible or I can walk into a dusty old shop and find a treasure waiting for me.
Regardless of any form they all disappear sooner or later. It all gets washed away by weather and time. So the next time you look at a book, well...
SMILE
Its a treasure, paper or not.
Here are some web links I borrowed from:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wood-pulp_paper
http://inventors.about.com/library/inventors/blpapermaking.htm
http://www.tappi.org/paperu/all_about_paper/paperHistory.htm
http://www.wipapercouncil.org/invention.htm
Here are some some books:
http://www.amazon.com/Papermaking-Dover-Lettering-Graphic-Printing/dp/0486236196
From: http://www.papermaking.net/amazon.htm
The Art and Craft of Papermaking by Sophie Dawson is my favorite papermaking book. It takes you from great step by step instructions on the very basics to explanations of works by all kinds of creative paper artists. ISBN 1561381586
Papermaking with Plants by Helen Heibert is great if you want to work with natural fibers. Again it has great photography as well as easy to read instructions. Rumor has it that she is also working on a pigment book but it is not out quite yet. ISBN 1580170870 - She also has a new book out called the Papermakers Companion. It has a lot of information but pictures are small and hard to follow.
Papermaking - The History and Technique of an Ancient Craft by Dard Hunter is THE book if you are looking for information about the history of papermaking. ISBN 0486236196
The Cloudmakers by James Rumford is a darling children's book. It is a cute story about how a boy and his grandfather take their shoes off and make paper out of their sandals to save their lives. ISBN 0395765056
Paper Art - The Complete Guide to Papercraft Techniques by Diane Maurer-Mathison ISBN 0823038408
Cover to Cover - Creative Techniques for Making Beautiful Books, Journals and Albums by Shereen LaPlantz ISBN 0937274879
Yesterday I was in a book shop on Clark street and Wells (here in Chicago) and was looking at the high stacks and thinking about the books all around me. I thought, even in a hundred years I couldn't read all of these books. (Not that it was a big book shop, it just had too many books.) So I set aside the daunting purpose of their place here and now and drifted into deep thought about the packaging. Most of these books will end up in a landfill or will wisely be recycled. That is a comfort to someone who loves them just a little less than the planet which provided the materials to make them. That is, the ink, the wood pulp, and the carbon based bipeds who first wrote, edited, and published them.
I asked the owner of the shop, a worn man in his early sixties (his face looks as if it were a painting by Guiseppe Arcimboldo) if he knew what the oldest book was in his shop is and he rolled his eyes and said "How the hell should I know that?" He then returned to his work. This guy is old school all the way. He doesn't even use a register. He has a cigar box. He figures the tax out in his head. So I went back to poking around. My reason for asking was that I wanted to see a book printed in the old way from linen or some rag stock paper, with fine leather cover for example.
Two weeks before I had been reading about the development of paper and how in the mid 19Th century paper manufactures went from using finer more sturdy pulp of cloth like fibers to wood pulp. Everyone knows that newsprint (the paper that gets its name from it being most commonly used by news papers) is full of acids that over time yellow and break down the fibers of the paper. But early on in the beginning of its processing history the demand came when more and more people were learning to read and write. The invention of a reliable fountain pen (or reservoir pen as it was called then) also spurred a demand for cheap paper. This, along with the steam engine, and the Fourdrinier press, made such paper in the beginning possible.
Much of the early paper made from wood pulp contained significant amounts of alum, a variety of aluminum sulfate salts that are significantly acidic. Alum was added to paper to assist in sizing the paper,[6] making it somewhat water resistant so that inks did not "run" or spread uncontrollably. The early paper makers did not realize that the alum they added liberally to cure almost every problem encountered in making their product would eventually be detrimental.[4] The cellulose fibers which make up paper are hydrolyzed by acid, and the presence of alum would eventually degrade the fibers until the paper disintegrated in a process which has come to be known as "slow fire". Documents written on rag paper were significantly more stable. The use of non-acidic additives to make paper is becoming more prevalent and the stability of these papers is less of an issue.
Paper made from mechanical pulp contains significant amounts of lignin, a major component in wood. In the presence of light and oxygen lignin reacts to give yellow materials, which is why newsprint and other mechanical paper yellows with age. Paper made from bleached kraft or sulfite pulps does not contain significant amounts of lignin and is therefore better suited for books, documents and other applications where whiteness of the paper is essential.
This is all very basic description borrowed from a link below. The science behind it (chemistry) is something I am not good at appreciating. I do have a fondness for anything that lasts a long time. It fascinates me to consider that some paper in the right conditions can survive a very long time. In fact newspaper newsprint from the early part of the 20TH century have been discovered in landfills and other situations where it was buried, and the paper was in remarkable condition. The secret is to keep it out of sunlight. Sunlight is a powerful corrosive. (For people, too).
So I wanted to see something other than the wood pulp that I have known (and only known) my whole life. Trouble is, that is all there is. In the west before wood paper there were two chief candidates (other than clay tablets) for recording thought. One was the Egyptian Papyrus (a fiber derived from a plant called the papyrus plant (duh!) and the Greek solution of parchment or vellum, which was commonly made from sheep or calf's skin. (Uck!). The stuff has a long shelf life though. Think about the Dead Sea Scrolls for example. Granted they were stored in a desert in a cave (and out of the sun!) and held in clay pots.
Paper making is said to go back to China in the 2ND century where inspired by wasps, the Han Dynasty Chinese court official Cai Lun is widely regarded to have invented the modern method of paper making. He must have gotten tired of using silk, bone, and bamboo.
But try and get parchment, or papyrus on Clark Street and they look at you like you are nuts. So I ponder the depth of fortune of sunlight, landfills, dumb luck and careful stinginess of ancient looking booksellers.
Wondrous. That is what I come to in the end. The act of reading on crumbly old cheep novels and on dirty daily rags is no less noble than on the finest silk or parchment. A shepherd boy may fling a rock into a cave and discover lost texts of the Bible or I can walk into a dusty old shop and find a treasure waiting for me.
Regardless of any form they all disappear sooner or later. It all gets washed away by weather and time. So the next time you look at a book, well...
SMILE
Its a treasure, paper or not.
Here are some web links I borrowed from:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wood-pulp_paper
http://inventors.about.com/library/inventors/blpapermaking.htm
http://www.tappi.org/paperu/all_about_paper/paperHistory.htm
http://www.wipapercouncil.org/invention.htm
Here are some some books:
http://www.amazon.com/Papermaking-Dover-Lettering-Graphic-Printing/dp/0486236196
From: http://www.papermaking.net/amazon.htm
The Art and Craft of Papermaking by Sophie Dawson is my favorite papermaking book. It takes you from great step by step instructions on the very basics to explanations of works by all kinds of creative paper artists. ISBN 1561381586
Papermaking with Plants by Helen Heibert is great if you want to work with natural fibers. Again it has great photography as well as easy to read instructions. Rumor has it that she is also working on a pigment book but it is not out quite yet. ISBN 1580170870 - She also has a new book out called the Papermakers Companion. It has a lot of information but pictures are small and hard to follow.
Papermaking - The History and Technique of an Ancient Craft by Dard Hunter is THE book if you are looking for information about the history of papermaking. ISBN 0486236196
The Cloudmakers by James Rumford is a darling children's book. It is a cute story about how a boy and his grandfather take their shoes off and make paper out of their sandals to save their lives. ISBN 0395765056
Paper Art - The Complete Guide to Papercraft Techniques by Diane Maurer-Mathison ISBN 0823038408
Cover to Cover - Creative Techniques for Making Beautiful Books, Journals and Albums by Shereen LaPlantz ISBN 0937274879
Sunday, January 27, 2008
Virtual Proof of Reading
Increase in Online Reading of Newspapers
Newspapers Online: 2007 Record Setting Year
By Marisa Peacock
Jan 25. 2008
Filed Under: newspapers nielsen online publishing web publishing
If there is any doubt that users are going online to read their news, there’s finally proof to dissuade you from thinking otherwise.
According to data released in a new report by Nielsen Online for the Newspaper Association of America (NAA), average monthly unique audience figures for newspaper Web sites grew by more than 3.6 million in 2007. This is a record year for the industry and an increase of more than six percent over 2006 numbers.
In addition, monthly unique visitors to these sites averaged 62.8 million in last year’s fourth quarter. This itself is a record as it is the largest in any quarter since NAA began tracking online usage in January 2004.
Interestingly, October proved to be a boom for newspaper Web sites as they experienced more than 63.2 million people, more than any month on record.
Well, this does make perfect sense. Where do most adults spend there time at work? I wanted post that people are reading as much news print as in 2006. The truth of the matter is that at least people are still reading. This does not say much about what they are reading, however. That would be interesting to know.
Why was there a peak in October?
If the average Googler is hopping around and stops to get the weather or read the sports section are they expecting it gratis or are they willing to pause and pay for a subscription?
Any thoughts?
Here is a link to the story:
http://www.cmswire.com/cms/web-publishing/newspapers-online-2007-record-setting-year-002243.php
Newspapers Online: 2007 Record Setting Year
By Marisa Peacock
Jan 25. 2008
Filed Under: newspapers nielsen online publishing web publishing
If there is any doubt that users are going online to read their news, there’s finally proof to dissuade you from thinking otherwise.
According to data released in a new report by Nielsen Online for the Newspaper Association of America (NAA), average monthly unique audience figures for newspaper Web sites grew by more than 3.6 million in 2007. This is a record year for the industry and an increase of more than six percent over 2006 numbers.
In addition, monthly unique visitors to these sites averaged 62.8 million in last year’s fourth quarter. This itself is a record as it is the largest in any quarter since NAA began tracking online usage in January 2004.
Interestingly, October proved to be a boom for newspaper Web sites as they experienced more than 63.2 million people, more than any month on record.
Well, this does make perfect sense. Where do most adults spend there time at work? I wanted post that people are reading as much news print as in 2006. The truth of the matter is that at least people are still reading. This does not say much about what they are reading, however. That would be interesting to know.
Why was there a peak in October?
If the average Googler is hopping around and stops to get the weather or read the sports section are they expecting it gratis or are they willing to pause and pay for a subscription?
Any thoughts?
Here is a link to the story:
http://www.cmswire.com/cms/web-publishing/newspapers-online-2007-record-setting-year-002243.php
Saturday, January 26, 2008
Why Libraries Are So Damn Important?
I am a Nerd, So Carl Sagan Makes It Sound Cool...Even All Those Greek Names...
Here is a link to info on this fabled library:
http://www.bede.org.uk/library.htm#intro
Here is a link to info on this fabled library:
http://www.bede.org.uk/library.htm#intro
Fringe Benefits Eyeballed
Is free Internet Access in Public Libraries Good for People?
Everyone say: "Yes". But up till now the burning question, ok, maybe its just smoldering, will be answered by The federal Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS) will work with the University of Washington Information School (iSchool) on a national study of the social, economic, personal, and professional value of such access.
Up until now there has been no in depth study to discover the long term impact of such offerings on the house. Questions like how will this benefit communities, their families and individuals will be addressed along with negative implications. It is hoped that such research will be sound evidence of a public need, and that funding it is a priority. The intention is to draw the public into an awareness of funding needs. In other words, this isn't cheap, making technology and information exchange at this level open to all.
The iSchool will partner with the Urban Institute, a nonpartisan economic and social policy research organization. The $1 million project is supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
This will be an ongoing project through 2009.
Any thoughts?
http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6523424.html
Everyone say: "Yes". But up till now the burning question, ok, maybe its just smoldering, will be answered by The federal Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS) will work with the University of Washington Information School (iSchool) on a national study of the social, economic, personal, and professional value of such access.
Up until now there has been no in depth study to discover the long term impact of such offerings on the house. Questions like how will this benefit communities, their families and individuals will be addressed along with negative implications. It is hoped that such research will be sound evidence of a public need, and that funding it is a priority. The intention is to draw the public into an awareness of funding needs. In other words, this isn't cheap, making technology and information exchange at this level open to all.
The iSchool will partner with the Urban Institute, a nonpartisan economic and social policy research organization. The $1 million project is supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
This will be an ongoing project through 2009.
Any thoughts?
http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6523424.html
Game Night...Library?
Woah...Dude...I Like Went to the Library and These Old People Were Playing Guitar Hero 3...
Here comes the Wii: game-maker Nintendo has decided to donate 21 of the popular games (valued at $250 each) to encourage library gaming. The recipients are the Alpena County Library, MI; the Free Library of Philadelphia; the Pasco County Library, FL; Ann Arbor District Library, MI; the New York Public Library; and the American Library Association (ALA), which will use its Wii at various events to promote library gaming initiatives.
Indeed, gaming has become a growing trend in libraries—at the recent ALA Midwinter Meeting, YALSA kicked off the show with a gaming night, with demos of Wii and games to play for the 100 or so librarians who attended. Also, Council established a Games and Gaming Member Initiative Group(MIG). The LibSuccess wiki lists nearly 20 libraries known to have Wiis, which use infrared technology to capture the user’s movement and appeal to both teens and adults.
Well don't run to you're local branch to sign up. My worry is that (sorry to be a Cassandra and all) there will be the normal complaints of when will they be available for use by general public, why can't I check out games, when are you getting World of Warcraft...All of these cost money. In typical fashion there is talk about gaming and not more about money.
In previous posts I have discussed how librarians tend not to think in fiscally independent modes, but boxy models that tend to fail them when things get tough. I am now renewing my interest in this subject.
Who is going to pick up the ravenous tab for such expenses? In poor public library systems where directors can barely keep a staff or a decent serials list where is the money going to come from? What are the implications in the public eye? OCLC studies find that most public opinion is that the library is still the place for books...but video games?
These are meant in the spirit of practical good sense. I would do anything to get every age group through those doors. But at the end of the day there is the nasty matter of the bill. Am I killing the buzz before the party happens?
Any thoughts?
Here is the link to the press release I quoted:
http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6525309.html
Here comes the Wii: game-maker Nintendo has decided to donate 21 of the popular games (valued at $250 each) to encourage library gaming. The recipients are the Alpena County Library, MI; the Free Library of Philadelphia; the Pasco County Library, FL; Ann Arbor District Library, MI; the New York Public Library; and the American Library Association (ALA), which will use its Wii at various events to promote library gaming initiatives.
Indeed, gaming has become a growing trend in libraries—at the recent ALA Midwinter Meeting, YALSA kicked off the show with a gaming night, with demos of Wii and games to play for the 100 or so librarians who attended. Also, Council established a Games and Gaming Member Initiative Group(MIG). The LibSuccess wiki lists nearly 20 libraries known to have Wiis, which use infrared technology to capture the user’s movement and appeal to both teens and adults.
Well don't run to you're local branch to sign up. My worry is that (sorry to be a Cassandra and all) there will be the normal complaints of when will they be available for use by general public, why can't I check out games, when are you getting World of Warcraft...All of these cost money. In typical fashion there is talk about gaming and not more about money.
In previous posts I have discussed how librarians tend not to think in fiscally independent modes, but boxy models that tend to fail them when things get tough. I am now renewing my interest in this subject.
Who is going to pick up the ravenous tab for such expenses? In poor public library systems where directors can barely keep a staff or a decent serials list where is the money going to come from? What are the implications in the public eye? OCLC studies find that most public opinion is that the library is still the place for books...but video games?
These are meant in the spirit of practical good sense. I would do anything to get every age group through those doors. But at the end of the day there is the nasty matter of the bill. Am I killing the buzz before the party happens?
Any thoughts?
Here is the link to the press release I quoted:
http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6525309.html
Friday, January 25, 2008
What Was That Password Again?
For People Like Me, A Nice Gift Idea for People on the Computer A Lot
Anyone using a computer has three major types of headaches. Connectivity and technical glitches, privacy concerns, and finally log on information. Everyone has at least one to two email accounts, and an endless list of ids and passwords to recall. When small scraps of paper, Post-its, and backs of envelope's run out I sometimes spy folks writing down such important info on the back of their hands. Storing them on the computer can be risky, too. Phishers will do anything to get into your bank accounts or retrieve credit card numbers, social security numbers too.
A good solution is to have one central place to record this all. A company named Innovation Lab Inc. is now offering a solution. The Internet Password Organizer(TM). This 122-page book provides users with a single, centralized location to store their passwords and features a wire-bound spine for easy data entry. Laminate-reinforced tabbed dividers alphabetically separate the 5.5" x 8" pages keeping passwords organized for quick information retrieval.
Each entry includes fields for web page, user name, password, and notes. Additional "Bonus" sections store information about the user's Internet Service Provider, Home Network Configuration, Product Licenses, and other indispensable information required to resuscitate a user's computer when crisis strikes.
For people still used to the notion of this it may make more sense, or so I thought. But in designing this address/domain/info organizer, Innovation Labs surveyed customers and I believe for people at a desk or work station this is just what professional could use. Mark Alexander Barros (President of Innovation Labs Inc.) said "Our conversations with people revealed a common theme. Nothing beats writing your passwords down. The problem is, where? Post-it notes and loose scraps of paper are commonly used, but locating the right one at the right time really hinders work-flow. So people tend to use the 'Forgot your Password' link quite liberally. In fact, for many, that link is their password-management solution. Our goal is to provide a practical way for people to store and retrieve this information and present it in a familiar way."
I thought in a digital world centralized by I Phone and Cell phones/Blackberries, that a software version of this that can be downloaded to a users I phone would be a great success too. That way you could take it with you and when working remotely at home (lets say you are sick and want to catch up in your bathrobe and pink fussy bunny slippers) you can look it up no problem.
However, by writing something down we tend to recall it better. I know that this works for me that way. The utopia of the Mac world excluded, this seems like a great gift idea.
Any thoughts?
Here is the link to the story:
http://www.publishersnewswire.com/booknews/2008-01-0123-PNW002.shtml
Anyone using a computer has three major types of headaches. Connectivity and technical glitches, privacy concerns, and finally log on information. Everyone has at least one to two email accounts, and an endless list of ids and passwords to recall. When small scraps of paper, Post-its, and backs of envelope's run out I sometimes spy folks writing down such important info on the back of their hands. Storing them on the computer can be risky, too. Phishers will do anything to get into your bank accounts or retrieve credit card numbers, social security numbers too.
A good solution is to have one central place to record this all. A company named Innovation Lab Inc. is now offering a solution. The Internet Password Organizer(TM). This 122-page book provides users with a single, centralized location to store their passwords and features a wire-bound spine for easy data entry. Laminate-reinforced tabbed dividers alphabetically separate the 5.5" x 8" pages keeping passwords organized for quick information retrieval.
Each entry includes fields for web page, user name, password, and notes. Additional "Bonus" sections store information about the user's Internet Service Provider, Home Network Configuration, Product Licenses, and other indispensable information required to resuscitate a user's computer when crisis strikes.
For people still used to the notion of this it may make more sense, or so I thought. But in designing this address/domain/info organizer, Innovation Labs surveyed customers and I believe for people at a desk or work station this is just what professional could use. Mark Alexander Barros (President of Innovation Labs Inc.) said "Our conversations with people revealed a common theme. Nothing beats writing your passwords down. The problem is, where? Post-it notes and loose scraps of paper are commonly used, but locating the right one at the right time really hinders work-flow. So people tend to use the 'Forgot your Password' link quite liberally. In fact, for many, that link is their password-management solution. Our goal is to provide a practical way for people to store and retrieve this information and present it in a familiar way."
I thought in a digital world centralized by I Phone and Cell phones/Blackberries, that a software version of this that can be downloaded to a users I phone would be a great success too. That way you could take it with you and when working remotely at home (lets say you are sick and want to catch up in your bathrobe and pink fussy bunny slippers) you can look it up no problem.
However, by writing something down we tend to recall it better. I know that this works for me that way. The utopia of the Mac world excluded, this seems like a great gift idea.
Any thoughts?
Here is the link to the story:
http://www.publishersnewswire.com/booknews/2008-01-0123-PNW002.shtml
Wednesday, January 23, 2008
Peer that Blog, Cite that Site
Hybridization Daze
January 23, 2008 (Computerworld) -- A professor working on a book about digital fiction and video games has launched what some are calling the first blog-based peer-review process for an academic book.
Noah Wardrip-Fruin, an assistant professor of communication at the University of California San Diego, on Tuesday announced plans to post portions of his forthcoming book, Expressive Processing, on the Grand Text Auto blog for the next 10 weeks to seek peer review. The book to be published by MIT Press.
"Given that ours is a field in which major expertise is located outside the academy (like many other fields, from 1950s cinema to Civil War history), the Grand Text Auto community has been invaluable for my work," Wardrip-Fruin wrote in a blog post. "In fact, while writing the manuscript for Expressive Processing, I found myself regularly citing blog posts and comments, both from Grand Text Auto and elsewhere. Now I'm excited to take the blog/manuscript relationship to the next level, through an open peer review of the manuscript on the blog."
Wardrip-Fruin, a regular author at Grand Text Auto, asked his blog's readers to "please let me know if I get anything wrong. The project is very interdisciplinary, and I know some of you are experts in areas where I'm still learning. More generally, please let me know what you think of the arguments."
It is the logical expression in scholarship of popular culture that the web would find this reflection of its matrix. I began to think of communication in general. How we share and express has long been the province of print and telecommunication and now abstractly like print of a virtual mind, that is a virtual mind working away 24/7 as a human mind, although as a kind of virtual Jungian collective.
The development of the CommentPress software fascinates me. Writing in the margins of virtual text like a book is like the e-book pretending to be a print book. Strange.
Chris Joseph, digital writer in residence at the Institute for Creative Technologies at De Montfort University in the U.K., noted that although a traditional peer-review process will happen alongside the blog-based process, "we believe this experiment affirms the importance and legitimacy of online communities in the development scholarship, and [it] represents a significant step forward by an academic press into possible new hybrid models of publishing and review. With this experiment, we inch a little closer to an exciting fusion of old and new forms."
We are in a flux of hybridization of technology. Fun times! There are limits to a peer process in real/virtual time however. Most folks using the web are not using it to expressly for that purpose, but more as a free for all. It is more about that bridge for the integrity of the publisher, editor and author to remain intact, a traditional peer review must be done, blog review does have a place...
I often feel a kind of schizophrenia of the print and virtual models clashing, as I try to maintain some vestige of print organization and sensibility while working in the virtual landscape. The more I work in the virtual, the more the print rules and regulations (out of poor habit on my part) slip away like crumbling mortar holding the bricks of the old print matrix. My English teachers of past years would rightly be horrified. "What happened?" they might ask, dismayed.
Any thoughts?
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9058542&intsrc=hm_list
January 23, 2008 (Computerworld) -- A professor working on a book about digital fiction and video games has launched what some are calling the first blog-based peer-review process for an academic book.
Noah Wardrip-Fruin, an assistant professor of communication at the University of California San Diego, on Tuesday announced plans to post portions of his forthcoming book, Expressive Processing, on the Grand Text Auto blog for the next 10 weeks to seek peer review. The book to be published by MIT Press.
"Given that ours is a field in which major expertise is located outside the academy (like many other fields, from 1950s cinema to Civil War history), the Grand Text Auto community has been invaluable for my work," Wardrip-Fruin wrote in a blog post. "In fact, while writing the manuscript for Expressive Processing, I found myself regularly citing blog posts and comments, both from Grand Text Auto and elsewhere. Now I'm excited to take the blog/manuscript relationship to the next level, through an open peer review of the manuscript on the blog."
Wardrip-Fruin, a regular author at Grand Text Auto, asked his blog's readers to "please let me know if I get anything wrong. The project is very interdisciplinary, and I know some of you are experts in areas where I'm still learning. More generally, please let me know what you think of the arguments."
It is the logical expression in scholarship of popular culture that the web would find this reflection of its matrix. I began to think of communication in general. How we share and express has long been the province of print and telecommunication and now abstractly like print of a virtual mind, that is a virtual mind working away 24/7 as a human mind, although as a kind of virtual Jungian collective.
The development of the CommentPress software fascinates me. Writing in the margins of virtual text like a book is like the e-book pretending to be a print book. Strange.
Chris Joseph, digital writer in residence at the Institute for Creative Technologies at De Montfort University in the U.K., noted that although a traditional peer-review process will happen alongside the blog-based process, "we believe this experiment affirms the importance and legitimacy of online communities in the development scholarship, and [it] represents a significant step forward by an academic press into possible new hybrid models of publishing and review. With this experiment, we inch a little closer to an exciting fusion of old and new forms."
We are in a flux of hybridization of technology. Fun times! There are limits to a peer process in real/virtual time however. Most folks using the web are not using it to expressly for that purpose, but more as a free for all. It is more about that bridge for the integrity of the publisher, editor and author to remain intact, a traditional peer review must be done, blog review does have a place...
I often feel a kind of schizophrenia of the print and virtual models clashing, as I try to maintain some vestige of print organization and sensibility while working in the virtual landscape. The more I work in the virtual, the more the print rules and regulations (out of poor habit on my part) slip away like crumbling mortar holding the bricks of the old print matrix. My English teachers of past years would rightly be horrified. "What happened?" they might ask, dismayed.
Any thoughts?
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9058542&intsrc=hm_list
Tuesday, January 22, 2008
Monday, January 21, 2008
Saving the Net
New O.C.L.C. Task Force is Formed to Study Storage and Preservation of Internet Content
Reliable preservation and retrieval systems have been subjects of great debate in library circles since the Internet became the hub of exchange in the information world. While it is easy to find information, it is not always the best, and the act of tagging or bookmarking, creating links to sites and files are problematic because sites change, close down, and are not often reliable.
While the Information Age has created a global network society in which access to digital information via the Internet and other means has revolutionized science, education, commerce, government, and other aspects of our lives, this technology has also spawned some unwanted side-effects. Unlike earlier mediums of information—including stone, parchment and paper—minuscule electronic "data banks" often stored in memory sticks, hard drives, and on magnetic tape are far more fragile and susceptible to obsolescence and loss.
The Internet is a highly paced structure of movement with very few sorts of reliable storage for the long haul. How many times have you clicked on a link only to find it is a dead end? Why must people who wish to find something specific in many circumstances get a needle in an information haystack? These are some of the issues that need resolving. The work of this committee in part might be to suggest methods of extraction of a great deal of quality scholarship and information that may be lost over time without better storage and retrieval systems. As it stands now even more advanced search models like Google scholar on spit out long lists of files. Often we get a lot of nothing. Often we spend a lot of time on a computer searching.
This Task Force will convene a broad set of international experts from the academic, public and private sectors who will participate in quarterly discussion panels. The group will publish two substantial reports with their findings, including a final report in late 2009 that will include a set of actionable recommendations for digital preservation, taking into account a general economic framework to establish those objectives.
Just over a week from today the task force will have its first meeting in Washington D. C.. A web site is to be established to update the activities of the task force and for people interested to post their thoughts.
Any thoughts?
http://www.oclc.org/news/releases/200692.htm
Reliable preservation and retrieval systems have been subjects of great debate in library circles since the Internet became the hub of exchange in the information world. While it is easy to find information, it is not always the best, and the act of tagging or bookmarking, creating links to sites and files are problematic because sites change, close down, and are not often reliable.
While the Information Age has created a global network society in which access to digital information via the Internet and other means has revolutionized science, education, commerce, government, and other aspects of our lives, this technology has also spawned some unwanted side-effects. Unlike earlier mediums of information—including stone, parchment and paper—minuscule electronic "data banks" often stored in memory sticks, hard drives, and on magnetic tape are far more fragile and susceptible to obsolescence and loss.
The Internet is a highly paced structure of movement with very few sorts of reliable storage for the long haul. How many times have you clicked on a link only to find it is a dead end? Why must people who wish to find something specific in many circumstances get a needle in an information haystack? These are some of the issues that need resolving. The work of this committee in part might be to suggest methods of extraction of a great deal of quality scholarship and information that may be lost over time without better storage and retrieval systems. As it stands now even more advanced search models like Google scholar on spit out long lists of files. Often we get a lot of nothing. Often we spend a lot of time on a computer searching.
This Task Force will convene a broad set of international experts from the academic, public and private sectors who will participate in quarterly discussion panels. The group will publish two substantial reports with their findings, including a final report in late 2009 that will include a set of actionable recommendations for digital preservation, taking into account a general economic framework to establish those objectives.
Just over a week from today the task force will have its first meeting in Washington D. C.. A web site is to be established to update the activities of the task force and for people interested to post their thoughts.
Any thoughts?
http://www.oclc.org/news/releases/200692.htm
Will Buy Geeky Jetsam
New Buy Back Program Could Reshape Selling Landscape
The following link is to a story on a new trend in buying throw away gadgetry. The idea is to get you, rather than purchase an extended warranty, to pay a small fee of something like 10 dollars to get a guarantee that the retailer will buy it back when you upgrade or go to the next generation of the device.
Instead of being hit up for an extended warranty next time you buy a gadget, you may find yourself hearing a pitch from TechForward Inc., a Los Angeles-based company selling a "guaranteed" buyback plan for electronics.
The idea came from Jade Van Doren, Chief Executive Officer of TechForward, while traveling in Japan where the passion for Tech is an advanced art form. "I just started thinking about ways that you could build a company around ... encouraging people to live that lifestyle of temporary ownership," he said.
The idea of encouraging a turnover is not so advanced either. All companies plan strategies that include the shelf life of their product. In Japan, states Van Doren, people change out their phone every few months. It seems a matter of re framing the American consumers mind to that of such values.
It makes sense that for an agreed on fee at the time of the original purchase that a year down the road the company would take the approach. Consider that the next generation from beta's frequently release the next generation withing the same season as Betas. People wonder, why bother buying an extended warranty when a few months latter they are in the same store looking at the latest model. So rather than pay, $50.00 dollars at a Best Buy on an extended warranty, you would shell out ten to sell back your camera phone or other device.
Sounds great, right? Well there is one small catch. As time passes by you get less investment on junk when you take it back. After one year it is $40.00, after two, it is twenty. Van Doren says it helps keep the consumer update and the retailer gets the customer to come back into their store and spend more money. Their are limits, points out the article, and not all gadgets will qualify for such constructional offers.
There are already many companies who will take your tech trash, but they don't offer money back normally. Programs like this, maintains Van Doran, will stimulate the industry and make it more tempting for someone just on the verge of buying that new toy.
It may be good too, to consider that this echo friendly solution, despite its origins of profit driving sales will appeal to recyclers and Earth friendly minded users. It sounds good to me.
Any thoughts?
http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/ptech/01/17/gadget.buybacks.ap/index.html
The following link is to a story on a new trend in buying throw away gadgetry. The idea is to get you, rather than purchase an extended warranty, to pay a small fee of something like 10 dollars to get a guarantee that the retailer will buy it back when you upgrade or go to the next generation of the device.
Instead of being hit up for an extended warranty next time you buy a gadget, you may find yourself hearing a pitch from TechForward Inc., a Los Angeles-based company selling a "guaranteed" buyback plan for electronics.
The idea came from Jade Van Doren, Chief Executive Officer of TechForward, while traveling in Japan where the passion for Tech is an advanced art form. "I just started thinking about ways that you could build a company around ... encouraging people to live that lifestyle of temporary ownership," he said.
The idea of encouraging a turnover is not so advanced either. All companies plan strategies that include the shelf life of their product. In Japan, states Van Doren, people change out their phone every few months. It seems a matter of re framing the American consumers mind to that of such values.
It makes sense that for an agreed on fee at the time of the original purchase that a year down the road the company would take the approach. Consider that the next generation from beta's frequently release the next generation withing the same season as Betas. People wonder, why bother buying an extended warranty when a few months latter they are in the same store looking at the latest model. So rather than pay, $50.00 dollars at a Best Buy on an extended warranty, you would shell out ten to sell back your camera phone or other device.
Sounds great, right? Well there is one small catch. As time passes by you get less investment on junk when you take it back. After one year it is $40.00, after two, it is twenty. Van Doren says it helps keep the consumer update and the retailer gets the customer to come back into their store and spend more money. Their are limits, points out the article, and not all gadgets will qualify for such constructional offers.
There are already many companies who will take your tech trash, but they don't offer money back normally. Programs like this, maintains Van Doran, will stimulate the industry and make it more tempting for someone just on the verge of buying that new toy.
It may be good too, to consider that this echo friendly solution, despite its origins of profit driving sales will appeal to recyclers and Earth friendly minded users. It sounds good to me.
Any thoughts?
http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/ptech/01/17/gadget.buybacks.ap/index.html
Sunday, January 20, 2008
Dear Mr. Internet: Some Random Curses From the Print World
Low B Average and Beer for Everyone!
It seems everyone likes to bitch about Mr. Gates. This goes along with lamenting natural disasters and questioning if there is a God or not. The only trouble is we all know that Mr. Gates exists. His ubiquitous influence over all things PC in the world is troublesome for a lot of geeks and savvy users.
In an article (see link below) on year end caps gurus state their share of bitches about Microsoft Windows Vista and in another story I find that Microsoft has a large portion of a Mexican brewery, a recent acquisition. I wonder if this is a move into other markets, where one day Mr. Gates, Rupert Murdoch, and Oprah, along with a handful of moguls will carve up the earth into some Orwellian jigsaw puzzle.
What it means to live in a corporate world? About the same as living in the Christian world when the Vatican was the final word on power, money and of course (but not least) God. Complaints are issued. Users lose what is left of there partitioned mind of 1's and 0's but Mr Gates stays at the top like Oprah stays on the cover of her monthly, modestly named "O".
Is it all shouting in the wind? Perhaps. But like a blog it feels so right to let out a little steam when the error messages stack up and you feel as if it is a personal attack.
I was advised to steer clear of Vista for a couple of years. Its a beta release and there are going to be bugs, I was warned. Yet I kind of still want it. As crazy as it sounds I am a year behind on my Windows XP (awaiting service pack 3, due in a couple of months) and feel as if I am not legitimate. Some part of me feels as if I am writing this blog out on clay tablets in cuneiform.
What is about technology that is so spirit killing? Is it the helplessness? Is it just a matter of keeping up with the Jones? I can't say. There is something neurotic about technology. Living in the beta world can leave a librarian feeling exposed and useless. I want to shout. "Wait, I got all of these books and at least they don't respond with "illegal nonvirtual" or the humbuggery of "the server is down. Try again later." Print is print. It stays that way. Digital is like smoke. I thought I just read that. No, wait a minute.
Never mind...
Any thoughts?
http://gizmodo.com/336829/microsoft-year+end-report-card-b+
It seems everyone likes to bitch about Mr. Gates. This goes along with lamenting natural disasters and questioning if there is a God or not. The only trouble is we all know that Mr. Gates exists. His ubiquitous influence over all things PC in the world is troublesome for a lot of geeks and savvy users.
In an article (see link below) on year end caps gurus state their share of bitches about Microsoft Windows Vista and in another story I find that Microsoft has a large portion of a Mexican brewery, a recent acquisition. I wonder if this is a move into other markets, where one day Mr. Gates, Rupert Murdoch, and Oprah, along with a handful of moguls will carve up the earth into some Orwellian jigsaw puzzle.
What it means to live in a corporate world? About the same as living in the Christian world when the Vatican was the final word on power, money and of course (but not least) God. Complaints are issued. Users lose what is left of there partitioned mind of 1's and 0's but Mr Gates stays at the top like Oprah stays on the cover of her monthly, modestly named "O".
Is it all shouting in the wind? Perhaps. But like a blog it feels so right to let out a little steam when the error messages stack up and you feel as if it is a personal attack.
I was advised to steer clear of Vista for a couple of years. Its a beta release and there are going to be bugs, I was warned. Yet I kind of still want it. As crazy as it sounds I am a year behind on my Windows XP (awaiting service pack 3, due in a couple of months) and feel as if I am not legitimate. Some part of me feels as if I am writing this blog out on clay tablets in cuneiform.
What is about technology that is so spirit killing? Is it the helplessness? Is it just a matter of keeping up with the Jones? I can't say. There is something neurotic about technology. Living in the beta world can leave a librarian feeling exposed and useless. I want to shout. "Wait, I got all of these books and at least they don't respond with "illegal nonvirtual" or the humbuggery of "the server is down. Try again later." Print is print. It stays that way. Digital is like smoke. I thought I just read that. No, wait a minute.
Never mind...
Any thoughts?
http://gizmodo.com/336829/microsoft-year+end-report-card-b+
Thursday, January 17, 2008
Googling Good Deeds?
Virtual Purse Strings and Naysayers
January 17, 2008 Google.org Spreads a Wider Philanthropic Net
SAN FRANCISCO - Google.org, the philanthropic arm of Google Inc, said on Thursday it is expanding beyond funding for alternative energy to focus on projects in health and combating poverty and climate change.
Google.org is working with partners in five fields who will get $25 million in new grants and investments and help from Google employees.
Three of the projects are new, including one that will use of information technology to "predict and prevent" ecological, health or social crises in vulnerable regions. Its initial focus will be on Southeast Asia and tropical Africa.
"We want to take the advantages of Silicon Valley to the Rift Valley," said Dr. Larry Brilliant, executive director of Google.org, referring to support for projects in East Africa, in a conference call to discuss his group's plans.
Google.org mixes the star-power of the world's biggest Internet company with a change-the-world idealism that aims to inject new energy and activism into the world of philanthropy.
But critics question whether the tiny percentage of its $200 billion market capitalization Google has committed to good works is more than just a publicity stunt.
The norm may be cynicism and questioning the motivations behind this move to enter into such philanthropic ventures. But what use will come from such derision's. There aim may be being the big fish, but that is capitalism. I consider myself a liberal, and deeply concerned about issues of poverty, and ecological matters such as global warming. I support capitalism. It is good for a nation to produce a market where competition will benefit society. Technology, goods and services generally improve and are fostered when anyone can get in the game. This article also points out that Google funds projects that back small and medium-sized business in developing countries as a way to alleviate poverty and overcome the limits of both microlending -- grants usually under $500 to groups of villagers -- and conventional aid, involving grants of several-million dollars. That sounds like more than a stunt to me. If businesses in economically poor countries can get a foothold, then that is a good thing. Right?
We all seem to cross paths on a daily bases (or at least once a week at the least) with Google. For me it takes away some of the sting of my complaints knowing that some good is coming out of this behemoth's ubiquitous hold on my researching life.
Any thoughts?
Here is the full story (Italics are passages from this link):
http://www.internetnews.com/breakingnews/article.php/3722536
January 17, 2008 Google.org Spreads a Wider Philanthropic Net
SAN FRANCISCO - Google.org, the philanthropic arm of Google Inc, said on Thursday it is expanding beyond funding for alternative energy to focus on projects in health and combating poverty and climate change.
Google.org is working with partners in five fields who will get $25 million in new grants and investments and help from Google employees.
Three of the projects are new, including one that will use of information technology to "predict and prevent" ecological, health or social crises in vulnerable regions. Its initial focus will be on Southeast Asia and tropical Africa.
"We want to take the advantages of Silicon Valley to the Rift Valley," said Dr. Larry Brilliant, executive director of Google.org, referring to support for projects in East Africa, in a conference call to discuss his group's plans.
Google.org mixes the star-power of the world's biggest Internet company with a change-the-world idealism that aims to inject new energy and activism into the world of philanthropy.
But critics question whether the tiny percentage of its $200 billion market capitalization Google has committed to good works is more than just a publicity stunt.
The norm may be cynicism and questioning the motivations behind this move to enter into such philanthropic ventures. But what use will come from such derision's. There aim may be being the big fish, but that is capitalism. I consider myself a liberal, and deeply concerned about issues of poverty, and ecological matters such as global warming. I support capitalism. It is good for a nation to produce a market where competition will benefit society. Technology, goods and services generally improve and are fostered when anyone can get in the game. This article also points out that Google funds projects that back small and medium-sized business in developing countries as a way to alleviate poverty and overcome the limits of both microlending -- grants usually under $500 to groups of villagers -- and conventional aid, involving grants of several-million dollars. That sounds like more than a stunt to me. If businesses in economically poor countries can get a foothold, then that is a good thing. Right?
We all seem to cross paths on a daily bases (or at least once a week at the least) with Google. For me it takes away some of the sting of my complaints knowing that some good is coming out of this behemoth's ubiquitous hold on my researching life.
Any thoughts?
Here is the full story (Italics are passages from this link):
http://www.internetnews.com/breakingnews/article.php/3722536
Tuesday, January 15, 2008
Start them Very Very Young
Get Them Hooked!
It should be no surprise to parents and educators who are around this target audience day in and out. For librarians in the children's section it may be one more way to activate a passion for the public library. Called Web Playgrounds of the Very Young, major industry players such as Disney and Nickelodeon are getting there share of the pie. Its a booming market. “Get ready for total inundation,” said Debra Aho Williamson, an analyst at the research firm eMarketer, who estimates that 20 million children will be members of a virtual world by 2011, up from 8.2 million today. Even companies like Mattel and Lego are entering the market as well.
My question, and forgive me for asking, how much learning is a kid really doing at these sites?And is it just another marketing opportunity for these giants to profit off parents who wish to find appealing zones of safety that their children may play in without fear of inappropriate content or even worse, predators.
Disney’s goal is to develop a network of worlds that appeal to various age groups, much like the company’s model. Preschool children might start with Pixie Hollow or Toon Town, another of Disney’s worlds, grow into Club Penguin and the one for “Cars” and graduate to “Pirates of the Caribbean” and beyond, perhaps to fantasy football at ESPN.com.
Most of these are more cursory skill sets and web navigation. So it could be useful in getting a child interested in using computer (not a difficult task) and in a safe and friendly way.
A good friend of mine, a neighbor, who has two nephews and three nieces says that, Vivian just turning five will sit quietly for long periods when ever her mama will turn on "Ipies" (Vivian's pronunciation of Pixie Hollow). And this is a young lady who likes to play I can say "No" louder than you, according to my neighbor.
I have checked out the links below and to be honest, they seem oriented to selling, to me. But perhaps I am cynical. If children are learning anything remotely useful, are safe, healthy, and happy, that is all that matters. Right?
Any thoughts?
Here is the link to the New York Times article (italics are quoted passages):
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/31/business/31virtual.html?_r=2&oref=slogin&oref=slogin
Here are some of the playgrounds mentioned in the New York Times Article:
http://www.webkinz.com/index.html
http://www.clubpenguin.com/
http://www.moshimonsters.com/
http://www.stardoll.com/en/
http://play.toontown.com/webHome.php?r=431716&r=431024&r=674800&r=213428
http://disney.go.com/fairies/games/pixiehollow.html
It should be no surprise to parents and educators who are around this target audience day in and out. For librarians in the children's section it may be one more way to activate a passion for the public library. Called Web Playgrounds of the Very Young, major industry players such as Disney and Nickelodeon are getting there share of the pie. Its a booming market. “Get ready for total inundation,” said Debra Aho Williamson, an analyst at the research firm eMarketer, who estimates that 20 million children will be members of a virtual world by 2011, up from 8.2 million today. Even companies like Mattel and Lego are entering the market as well.
My question, and forgive me for asking, how much learning is a kid really doing at these sites?And is it just another marketing opportunity for these giants to profit off parents who wish to find appealing zones of safety that their children may play in without fear of inappropriate content or even worse, predators.
Disney’s goal is to develop a network of worlds that appeal to various age groups, much like the company’s model. Preschool children might start with Pixie Hollow or Toon Town, another of Disney’s worlds, grow into Club Penguin and the one for “Cars” and graduate to “Pirates of the Caribbean” and beyond, perhaps to fantasy football at ESPN.com.
Most of these are more cursory skill sets and web navigation. So it could be useful in getting a child interested in using computer (not a difficult task) and in a safe and friendly way.
A good friend of mine, a neighbor, who has two nephews and three nieces says that, Vivian just turning five will sit quietly for long periods when ever her mama will turn on "Ipies" (Vivian's pronunciation of Pixie Hollow). And this is a young lady who likes to play I can say "No" louder than you, according to my neighbor.
I have checked out the links below and to be honest, they seem oriented to selling, to me. But perhaps I am cynical. If children are learning anything remotely useful, are safe, healthy, and happy, that is all that matters. Right?
Any thoughts?
Here is the link to the New York Times article (italics are quoted passages):
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/31/business/31virtual.html?_r=2&oref=slogin&oref=slogin
Here are some of the playgrounds mentioned in the New York Times Article:
http://www.webkinz.com/index.html
http://www.clubpenguin.com/
http://www.moshimonsters.com/
http://www.stardoll.com/en/
http://play.toontown.com/webHome.php?r=431716&r=431024&r=674800&r=213428
http://disney.go.com/fairies/games/pixiehollow.html
New Database Alternative
Another Option for Hungry Researchers
ProQuest Announces Aggregated Full-Text Database for Libraries
ProQuest (www.proquest.com), part of Cambridge Information Group (www.cambridgeinformationgroup.com), has launched a new aggregated full-text database for libraries called ProQuest Central. The company says it is designed to serve as the foundational research collection for academic libraries. ProQuest Central offers more than 11,000 titles (8,000 in full text) and more than 160 subject areas covering core academic disciplines.
ProQuest Central’s coverage includes core disciplines such as business and economics, medical and health, news and world affairs, science, education, technology, humanities, social sciences, psychology, literature, law, and nursing. ProQuest Central, available now, combines content from top publishers such as Cambridge University Press, Emerald Group Publishing, MIT Sloan Management Review , Palgrave, Oxford University Press, Dow Jones, and more. Multiple content types are available, including scholarly and general reference journals, newspapers, full-text dissertations, company annual reports, industry reports, country reports, working papers, and more.
What looks promising about this database is that it may be striving to be more flexible and interface with users. It also appears to have a stated goal of covering a wide variety of subjects and services.
I was unable to access the service but the press release above provides a link to the home page where you can read about it.
I would love to hear first responses from anyone who has wet there feet with it.
Any thoughts?
Here is a link to the press release:
http://newsbreaks.infotoday.com/wndReader.asp?ArticleId=40608
ProQuest Announces Aggregated Full-Text Database for Libraries
ProQuest (www.proquest.com), part of Cambridge Information Group (www.cambridgeinformationgroup.com), has launched a new aggregated full-text database for libraries called ProQuest Central. The company says it is designed to serve as the foundational research collection for academic libraries. ProQuest Central offers more than 11,000 titles (8,000 in full text) and more than 160 subject areas covering core academic disciplines.
ProQuest Central’s coverage includes core disciplines such as business and economics, medical and health, news and world affairs, science, education, technology, humanities, social sciences, psychology, literature, law, and nursing. ProQuest Central, available now, combines content from top publishers such as Cambridge University Press, Emerald Group Publishing, MIT Sloan Management Review , Palgrave, Oxford University Press, Dow Jones, and more. Multiple content types are available, including scholarly and general reference journals, newspapers, full-text dissertations, company annual reports, industry reports, country reports, working papers, and more.
What looks promising about this database is that it may be striving to be more flexible and interface with users. It also appears to have a stated goal of covering a wide variety of subjects and services.
I was unable to access the service but the press release above provides a link to the home page where you can read about it.
I would love to hear first responses from anyone who has wet there feet with it.
Any thoughts?
Here is a link to the press release:
http://newsbreaks.infotoday.com/wndReader.asp?ArticleId=40608
Monday, January 14, 2008
New Wiki Search Engine Hardly a Splash
With Fewer Results and Proprietary Questions, Wales Still Defends His Newest Search Engine as Being Full of Potential. So? Prove It.
You almost have to have a good dose of P. T. Barnum mixed with the marketing skill of William Randolph Hearst these days on the Internet. Jimmy Wales, the democratic guru of information and sharing the wealth (information that is, not money) has made a lot of promises about his new Wikia. "I’m a big believer in ‘release early, release often,’ so things are going to change a lot." says Wales. Actually when you think of it, Wiki world is at heart the ideal user based social center of the Web. It can be edited and enriched by the same people for whom it is intended. Wikia too, is an example of this same user participation. Wikia is branded as a "social" search engine, significantly different from the big names in search, such as Google and Ask.com. Wikia is hoping that the open and participatory model will make Search Wikia the place to go for search results of higher quality.
Still, the results now are turning people away, according to TechCrunch (Michael Arrington), who cites the low numbers of search results when used. Granted, it is a young pup on the market. But it shall have to grow a lot in the coming months to be able to run with the pack. Are people really even going to think Wikia when the search. Already Google is in the lexicon of slang. When someone wants an answer they "Google it."
The advantage may come in its flexibility. Google is a fixed structure, but by its very nature wiki applications can be altered in ways that others cannot. It is, (Wikia) that is billed as being far more user friendly. Wales has a big promise to keep on this one. If he fails, however, the worst that can be said is that Google will have to work a little harder for its user dollar.
Any thoughts?
Italicized portions of this post were borrowed from an article by Woody Evans titled: "We Find It All: Wikia’s New Social Search Engine"
Here is the link to the story:
http://newsbreaks.infotoday.com/nbReader.asp?ArticleId=40606
Try Wikia out:
http://www.wikia.com/
You almost have to have a good dose of P. T. Barnum mixed with the marketing skill of William Randolph Hearst these days on the Internet. Jimmy Wales, the democratic guru of information and sharing the wealth (information that is, not money) has made a lot of promises about his new Wikia. "I’m a big believer in ‘release early, release often,’ so things are going to change a lot." says Wales. Actually when you think of it, Wiki world is at heart the ideal user based social center of the Web. It can be edited and enriched by the same people for whom it is intended. Wikia too, is an example of this same user participation. Wikia is branded as a "social" search engine, significantly different from the big names in search, such as Google and Ask.com. Wikia is hoping that the open and participatory model will make Search Wikia the place to go for search results of higher quality.
Still, the results now are turning people away, according to TechCrunch (Michael Arrington), who cites the low numbers of search results when used. Granted, it is a young pup on the market. But it shall have to grow a lot in the coming months to be able to run with the pack. Are people really even going to think Wikia when the search. Already Google is in the lexicon of slang. When someone wants an answer they "Google it."
The advantage may come in its flexibility. Google is a fixed structure, but by its very nature wiki applications can be altered in ways that others cannot. It is, (Wikia) that is billed as being far more user friendly. Wales has a big promise to keep on this one. If he fails, however, the worst that can be said is that Google will have to work a little harder for its user dollar.
Any thoughts?
Italicized portions of this post were borrowed from an article by Woody Evans titled: "We Find It All: Wikia’s New Social Search Engine"
Here is the link to the story:
http://newsbreaks.infotoday.com/nbReader.asp?ArticleId=40606
Try Wikia out:
http://www.wikia.com/
Saturday, January 12, 2008
Friday, January 11, 2008
And Now for Something Really Big
I'm Sorry, How Much Did You Say She Took?
Borrower goes wild at library
Akron woman accused of taking 1,000 items
By Phil Trexler and Katie Byard
Beacon Journal staff writers
Published on Friday, Dec 21, 2007
By police accounts, she had 34 kids, each with a love for DVDs, books and toys.
In reality, Tammie Ware of Akron had just four kids.
And, according to officials, she also had more than 1,000 ''borrowed'' library items, ranging from movies to books to music and toys inside her home.
Some of the items were obtained with a library card, others were not. The items belonging to the Akron-Summit County Public Library and collected by police this week rang up at more than $15,000, plus about $1,000 in overdue return fees, according to police reports and library officials.
Akron police Lt. Rick Edwards said it took a pickup truck to haul the materials from Ware's home this week, but the library has its stuff back, generally in good condition.
As for Ware, 36, she is facing charges of theft and receiving stolen property. She is free on bond. No phone number could be found to reach her for comment.
Hmm...There is, according to Dante, a circle of Hell reserved for people like this. Or, I could say, she must love her children very much...ha-ha-ha...
This is the stuff of urban legends. Folk songs will be written about this woman. Rightly so. At a certain point you stop being disgusted and secretly admire anyone who could run a scam like this with kids.
You will remember in Oliver Twist Fagin (Fagin was based on real-life Jewish fence Ikey Soloman,1758-1850) paternal instincts where as good as this woman's. Though I doubt a musical will be made based on her exploits any time soon.
A book on the subject is crying out to be written, however. Something on the abuse of the library systems by patrons, and the librarians secret fantasies about how they would seek revenge on selfish people.
Any thoughts?
Here is a link to the story:
http://www.ohio.com/news/12695697.html
Borrower goes wild at library
Akron woman accused of taking 1,000 items
By Phil Trexler and Katie Byard
Beacon Journal staff writers
Published on Friday, Dec 21, 2007
By police accounts, she had 34 kids, each with a love for DVDs, books and toys.
In reality, Tammie Ware of Akron had just four kids.
And, according to officials, she also had more than 1,000 ''borrowed'' library items, ranging from movies to books to music and toys inside her home.
Some of the items were obtained with a library card, others were not. The items belonging to the Akron-Summit County Public Library and collected by police this week rang up at more than $15,000, plus about $1,000 in overdue return fees, according to police reports and library officials.
Akron police Lt. Rick Edwards said it took a pickup truck to haul the materials from Ware's home this week, but the library has its stuff back, generally in good condition.
As for Ware, 36, she is facing charges of theft and receiving stolen property. She is free on bond. No phone number could be found to reach her for comment.
Hmm...There is, according to Dante, a circle of Hell reserved for people like this. Or, I could say, she must love her children very much...ha-ha-ha...
This is the stuff of urban legends. Folk songs will be written about this woman. Rightly so. At a certain point you stop being disgusted and secretly admire anyone who could run a scam like this with kids.
You will remember in Oliver Twist Fagin (Fagin was based on real-life Jewish fence Ikey Soloman,1758-1850) paternal instincts where as good as this woman's. Though I doubt a musical will be made based on her exploits any time soon.
A book on the subject is crying out to be written, however. Something on the abuse of the library systems by patrons, and the librarians secret fantasies about how they would seek revenge on selfish people.
Any thoughts?
Here is a link to the story:
http://www.ohio.com/news/12695697.html
More Than Your Typical Slap on the Wrist...
New York Man Learns that His Library Means Business
By ANNE BARNARD and JO CRAVEN McGINTY
Published: December 26, 2007
It may be wrong to return a library book late — or to never return it. But how severe should the punishment be? Should it include being saddled with a bad credit score?
Abraham Kleinman says no. Mr. Kleinman, a lawyer from Uniondale, N.Y., represented a Queens man who sued Unique Management Services for reporting his $295 late bill from the Queens Library system to credit bureaus. The man, Rabbi Avrohom Sebrow, won a settlement on a technicality — Unique’s license to operate in New York State had lapsed when it reported him — but Mr. Kleinman is still angry about the tactic that was used against his client.
A library fine is not really a debt, Mr. Kleinman argues, and should not be covered by regulations that allow collection agencies to report bad consumer behavior.
“That’s his opinion,” said Kenes Bowling, a spokesman for Unique. For 15 years, the company has operated a successful “materials collection” business as a debt collector for libraries, and it relies on its ability to threaten scofflaws with negative credit reports.
When a patron fails to return a book and is then billed for it by a library, Mr. Bowling said, “it is a legitimate debt, and it is credit-reportable.”
I must agree with Mr. Bowling. Libraries ought to be able to protect their interests, and if a patron abuses privileges then often there is no other recourse. I have no knowledge of that particular libraries policies. I would assume like most they are liberal and favor cutting the patron some slack.
I laughed on reading this story. The man, a Rabbi, should know better. How honest is that for a "a man of God" to be skipping out on library fines? My instinct would be to tease him and give him one more chance to pay the bill before revoking his library card.
Everyone has heard jokes about angry librarians taking matters in their own hands. Better watch your steps. The library mafia will come and get you...ha-ha-ha...
Still, as someone who loves libraries I side with the library who stuck it to this guy. Why shouldn't it be considered a debt? The whole point is to remember that what you borrow is not your property.
No, its not like snatching purses or robing banks at gun point. More like stealing candy from a baby.
Rabbi Avrohom Sebrow, shame on you!
;)
Any thoughts?
Here is the link to the full story:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/26/nyregion/26debate.html?_r=1&adxnnl=1&oref=slogin&adxnnlx=1200085355-ULRAHzLJY0NjAi6qnNtGyw
By ANNE BARNARD and JO CRAVEN McGINTY
Published: December 26, 2007
It may be wrong to return a library book late — or to never return it. But how severe should the punishment be? Should it include being saddled with a bad credit score?
Abraham Kleinman says no. Mr. Kleinman, a lawyer from Uniondale, N.Y., represented a Queens man who sued Unique Management Services for reporting his $295 late bill from the Queens Library system to credit bureaus. The man, Rabbi Avrohom Sebrow, won a settlement on a technicality — Unique’s license to operate in New York State had lapsed when it reported him — but Mr. Kleinman is still angry about the tactic that was used against his client.
A library fine is not really a debt, Mr. Kleinman argues, and should not be covered by regulations that allow collection agencies to report bad consumer behavior.
“That’s his opinion,” said Kenes Bowling, a spokesman for Unique. For 15 years, the company has operated a successful “materials collection” business as a debt collector for libraries, and it relies on its ability to threaten scofflaws with negative credit reports.
When a patron fails to return a book and is then billed for it by a library, Mr. Bowling said, “it is a legitimate debt, and it is credit-reportable.”
I must agree with Mr. Bowling. Libraries ought to be able to protect their interests, and if a patron abuses privileges then often there is no other recourse. I have no knowledge of that particular libraries policies. I would assume like most they are liberal and favor cutting the patron some slack.
I laughed on reading this story. The man, a Rabbi, should know better. How honest is that for a "a man of God" to be skipping out on library fines? My instinct would be to tease him and give him one more chance to pay the bill before revoking his library card.
Everyone has heard jokes about angry librarians taking matters in their own hands. Better watch your steps. The library mafia will come and get you...ha-ha-ha...
Still, as someone who loves libraries I side with the library who stuck it to this guy. Why shouldn't it be considered a debt? The whole point is to remember that what you borrow is not your property.
No, its not like snatching purses or robing banks at gun point. More like stealing candy from a baby.
Rabbi Avrohom Sebrow, shame on you!
;)
Any thoughts?
Here is the link to the full story:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/26/nyregion/26debate.html?_r=1&adxnnl=1&oref=slogin&adxnnlx=1200085355-ULRAHzLJY0NjAi6qnNtGyw
Thursday, January 10, 2008
Reversal of Fortune
Wow, Didn't See that One Coming!
Jennifer Pinkowski -- Library Journal, 1/9/2008
A northern Illinois library will move into a space vacated by Barnes & Noble—and it's planning to keep many of the elements that have made B&N so popular with readers, including the café. Next month, the Rockford Public Library (RPL) plans to start reworking a 23,000-square-foot space for its new East Side branch, which will replace the much smaller Northeast branch. The move relocates the five-branch system's busiest library from the back of a bilevel strip mall to a stand-alone building in a centrally located shopping district. Moreover, Barnes & Noble is donating to the library most of the bookstore's fixtures, including shelves, desks, seating, and a checkout counter, which will help to reduce costs. The B&N relocated to a larger space in the local mall.
For all of us who champion libraries and their causes this is the kind of thing we want more of. I doubt that it will become a trend, however.
How often have you cruised through a superstore like B & N or Borders and felt guilty about not using the library instead?
Well, keep in mind I often see students in the cafes at B & N and Borders hard at work on their notebooks. I doubt they ever think of institution loyalty. Also keep in mind that many small branch public libraries become dumping grounds for homeless people, and that they are not any quieter than a cafe in a bookstore. This can make the public library a mixed bag and not always reliable place for peace and quiet. I hate typing that. I love libraries. But facts are facts.
Many professionals in the industry now admit their are lessons to be learned from bookstores when it comes to customer satisfaction. Its easy to find a book and you can have a lovely cup of tea or a cup of java if you prefer while reading it!
One of the reasons I believe libraries are holding their own (as mentioned in a recent PEW study) may be that Americans think of free libraries as being part of their inherited public services available to them. Free public libraries are more American than they are universal. That is Americans may simply assume that it will always be there for them.
That same report sadly finds use of public libraries drops as its patrons get older, however.
I just loved this news story. Winning one for our side is great!
Any thoughts?
Here are a couple of good links:
http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6517947.html
http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/231/report_display.asp
Jennifer Pinkowski -- Library Journal, 1/9/2008
A northern Illinois library will move into a space vacated by Barnes & Noble—and it's planning to keep many of the elements that have made B&N so popular with readers, including the café. Next month, the Rockford Public Library (RPL) plans to start reworking a 23,000-square-foot space for its new East Side branch, which will replace the much smaller Northeast branch. The move relocates the five-branch system's busiest library from the back of a bilevel strip mall to a stand-alone building in a centrally located shopping district. Moreover, Barnes & Noble is donating to the library most of the bookstore's fixtures, including shelves, desks, seating, and a checkout counter, which will help to reduce costs. The B&N relocated to a larger space in the local mall.
For all of us who champion libraries and their causes this is the kind of thing we want more of. I doubt that it will become a trend, however.
How often have you cruised through a superstore like B & N or Borders and felt guilty about not using the library instead?
Well, keep in mind I often see students in the cafes at B & N and Borders hard at work on their notebooks. I doubt they ever think of institution loyalty. Also keep in mind that many small branch public libraries become dumping grounds for homeless people, and that they are not any quieter than a cafe in a bookstore. This can make the public library a mixed bag and not always reliable place for peace and quiet. I hate typing that. I love libraries. But facts are facts.
Many professionals in the industry now admit their are lessons to be learned from bookstores when it comes to customer satisfaction. Its easy to find a book and you can have a lovely cup of tea or a cup of java if you prefer while reading it!
One of the reasons I believe libraries are holding their own (as mentioned in a recent PEW study) may be that Americans think of free libraries as being part of their inherited public services available to them. Free public libraries are more American than they are universal. That is Americans may simply assume that it will always be there for them.
That same report sadly finds use of public libraries drops as its patrons get older, however.
I just loved this news story. Winning one for our side is great!
Any thoughts?
Here are a couple of good links:
http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6517947.html
http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/231/report_display.asp
Tuesday, January 8, 2008
War and Loss
War and Libraries Continued...
The returning Kurdish Director of the Iraq National Library is interviewed recently by the BBC. In this rather heart wrenching description of the destruction welded under Saddam Hussein's tyrannical reign of terror and the invasion which brought it to an end, we learn about his plans. With losses of over 65-90% of the libraries content, I found it very inspiring to hear about this man's passion for returning his family to his homeland and returning to building a professional life.
When you hear descriptions such as these, one feels small for complaining about some of our library issues. I am providing a link to this story.
Any thoughts?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/7177208.stm
The returning Kurdish Director of the Iraq National Library is interviewed recently by the BBC. In this rather heart wrenching description of the destruction welded under Saddam Hussein's tyrannical reign of terror and the invasion which brought it to an end, we learn about his plans. With losses of over 65-90% of the libraries content, I found it very inspiring to hear about this man's passion for returning his family to his homeland and returning to building a professional life.
When you hear descriptions such as these, one feels small for complaining about some of our library issues. I am providing a link to this story.
Any thoughts?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/7177208.stm
Monday, January 7, 2008
Resume Time!
On Basics, Rules, Selling Yourself, Services, and Other Thoughts
I promised to write more on employment issues each month. This time I intend to write on resumes.
Below is a link on writing a good resume.
The key to good documents of this kind is clarity and organization. All information must be straight forward and to the point. It must be free of errors. The worst thing possible is to leave a typo or spelling error in such an important document.
Another important issue is to think of how the document will make an impression. The person reading this (most likely an HR manager) is as busy as any other professional, and will not waste any time on a resume with flaws. It will go into the trash. So keeping this in mind:
1. Keep it easy to read
That is, no strange resume paper (classic white is best) or odd fonts. The standard is Times Roman. Do not shrink the font below 12. It doesn't matter what your tastes are. You are trying to get the attention of others.
2. Keep it short
The only acceptable circumstance in which a resume is longer than a page is when it is an academic (curriculum vitae) or if you have been doing this work for a long time. Hence, experience listed should be relevant or at least demonstrate skill sets that apply to positions you are applying to.
3. Organize it with care
For example: if you are just leaving school and have very little work related experience then list your education first and then your experience. When discussing your qualities, those skill sets that make you worth interviewing, list them in bullet points, or some other logical form which is easy to read. The impression you want is that of a highly organized individual who is able to work in an autonomous and professional manner.
4. Sell yourself
The whole point of a resume is to put yourself out into a market where you will be competing with other people. Think of your resume sitting on a grocery shelf with dozens others (the grocery shelf is my clumsy symbol for a desk) who are all vying for the attention of a mother who is most likely tired or has missed lunch because she was too busy to stop and eat. You want her to see you first. She is going to read the label, so make it easy on her. Make sure she understands what a great product you are!
5. Have someone else proof read
I am a terrible proof reader. Actually many writers are. Getting a second set of eyes (usually fresh and disconnected from what they are reading) will almost always see mistakes that you have missed. Get someone who is good at it though. Normally they will do it as a favor. They enjoy doing it.
6. Be Cautious of Resume writing services
There are excellent services that can do all of these things for you. But they cost a boat load of money. If you have the money to spare, then fine. Go for it! My experience, however, is that recent grad students don't normally have a lot of money to spend. Read up on the service. Look for testimonials. How long have they been in business? Be smart. If you have any doubts, do not get that credit card out. Don't spend a lot of money on books either. If you must use them go to a library and take notes, or if you must, a Borders and sit with a nice cup of tea in the cafe.
I hope this brief discussion gets you thinking (its only a start) on what is one of the most important pieces of paper in your life. Like your birth certificate it is vital as a professional that it is smart and up to date.
Here are some links!
http://www.rogers-resume-help-center.com/sample-librarians-resume.html
http://www.lisjobs.com/advice.htm#start
http://www.questcareer.com/tips.htm
http://www.free-resume-tips.com/10tips.html
http://www.rockportinstitute.com/resumes.html
http://www.resume-help.org/resume_writing_tips.htm
http://www.careerjournal.com/jobhunting/resumes/
Some Good Services (keep in mind they charge):
http://www.resumeedge.com/
http://www.resumewriters.com/
http://www.careerperfect.com/content/professional-resume-writing-services-overview?partner=resumelines&cpsrc=resume_main
http://www.1-on-1-resumes.com/
http://www.employment911.com/resumes/resume-writing.asp?B=357&A=2373
http://www.blueprintresumes.com/#a2179l1hx
http://www.aspirationsresume.com/
Coming Soon:
Cover Letters!
I promised to write more on employment issues each month. This time I intend to write on resumes.
Below is a link on writing a good resume.
The key to good documents of this kind is clarity and organization. All information must be straight forward and to the point. It must be free of errors. The worst thing possible is to leave a typo or spelling error in such an important document.
Another important issue is to think of how the document will make an impression. The person reading this (most likely an HR manager) is as busy as any other professional, and will not waste any time on a resume with flaws. It will go into the trash. So keeping this in mind:
1. Keep it easy to read
That is, no strange resume paper (classic white is best) or odd fonts. The standard is Times Roman. Do not shrink the font below 12. It doesn't matter what your tastes are. You are trying to get the attention of others.
2. Keep it short
The only acceptable circumstance in which a resume is longer than a page is when it is an academic (curriculum vitae) or if you have been doing this work for a long time. Hence, experience listed should be relevant or at least demonstrate skill sets that apply to positions you are applying to.
3. Organize it with care
For example: if you are just leaving school and have very little work related experience then list your education first and then your experience. When discussing your qualities, those skill sets that make you worth interviewing, list them in bullet points, or some other logical form which is easy to read. The impression you want is that of a highly organized individual who is able to work in an autonomous and professional manner.
4. Sell yourself
The whole point of a resume is to put yourself out into a market where you will be competing with other people. Think of your resume sitting on a grocery shelf with dozens others (the grocery shelf is my clumsy symbol for a desk) who are all vying for the attention of a mother who is most likely tired or has missed lunch because she was too busy to stop and eat. You want her to see you first. She is going to read the label, so make it easy on her. Make sure she understands what a great product you are!
5. Have someone else proof read
I am a terrible proof reader. Actually many writers are. Getting a second set of eyes (usually fresh and disconnected from what they are reading) will almost always see mistakes that you have missed. Get someone who is good at it though. Normally they will do it as a favor. They enjoy doing it.
6. Be Cautious of Resume writing services
There are excellent services that can do all of these things for you. But they cost a boat load of money. If you have the money to spare, then fine. Go for it! My experience, however, is that recent grad students don't normally have a lot of money to spend. Read up on the service. Look for testimonials. How long have they been in business? Be smart. If you have any doubts, do not get that credit card out. Don't spend a lot of money on books either. If you must use them go to a library and take notes, or if you must, a Borders and sit with a nice cup of tea in the cafe.
I hope this brief discussion gets you thinking (its only a start) on what is one of the most important pieces of paper in your life. Like your birth certificate it is vital as a professional that it is smart and up to date.
Here are some links!
http://www.rogers-resume-help-center.com/sample-librarians-resume.html
http://www.lisjobs.com/advice.htm#start
http://www.questcareer.com/tips.htm
http://www.free-resume-tips.com/10tips.html
http://www.rockportinstitute.com/resumes.html
http://www.resume-help.org/resume_writing_tips.htm
http://www.careerjournal.com/jobhunting/resumes/
Some Good Services (keep in mind they charge):
http://www.resumeedge.com/
http://www.resumewriters.com/
http://www.careerperfect.com/content/professional-resume-writing-services-overview?partner=resumelines&cpsrc=resume_main
http://www.1-on-1-resumes.com/
http://www.employment911.com/resumes/resume-writing.asp?B=357&A=2373
http://www.blueprintresumes.com/#a2179l1hx
http://www.aspirationsresume.com/
Coming Soon:
Cover Letters!
Sunday, January 6, 2008
A Matter of Privacy
Dirty Little Secrets and Their URL'S
I am posting this in full with a link because it is so interesting:
AskEraser: Privacy Potential by Greg R. Notess Posted On January 3, 2008
As web searching becomes ever more common in all aspects of our lives, the issue of our online privacy, or lack thereof, is an increasing concern. Searches and visits can be, and usually are, tracked and logged by any website. The information recorded can include a user’s IP address, the previous URL visited, the browser and operating system used, information in cookies set by that site, and search terms used. While none of this information can necessarily identify a specific user, the August 2006 release of AOL search data (see the NewsBreak at http://newsbreaks.infotoday.com/nbreader.asp?ArticleID=17374) showed that some personally identifiable information may be extracted from just a series of search queries.
On Dec. 11, 2007, Ask.com (http://www.ask.com/) introduced AskEraser as one way to help combat concerns with searching privacy. It gives searchers the ability to choose whether or not to preserve their own privacy when searching Ask. By default, it is not turned on, but the AskEraser link is featured in the upper right-hand corner of Ask pages. Users can click that link for the option to turn AskEraser on. AskEraser is available on the main U.S. Ask.com site and at the U.K. version (http://www.uk.ask.com/).
While most search engines (including Ask) have previously stated that they will not keep search log data for longer than 18 months, AskEraser gives users the ability to have their data deleted sooner than that. Patrick Crisp, a spokesman for Ask.com, said that "with AskEraser, we’re in a very real sense laying down a strong industry ‘marker’ that we expect others will follow."
With AskEraser turned on, all Ask cookies are deleted from the browser and one new cookie is set, which only tells Ask that AskEraser is enabled. "Within hours" of a search being run, AskEraser promises that the search activity will be deleted from its log files. Once that deletion has occurred, Ask no longer has any record of those specific searches. The information deleted includes the following:
The IP address of the computer being used
Cookies containing user ID or session ID information
The text of the search query
Older search activity from before the launch of AskEraser or from searches run without an enabled AskEraser will be retained in the logs for 18 months after the search was run.
This is not a simple process. Note that since the concept was first announced in July (www.irconnect.com/askj/pages/news_releases.html?d=123324), it took Ask months to implement it. Part of the difficulty is that logs are automatically recorded for all searches, and getting specific search activity deleted requires additional actions from the search company. This is also why the deletion from the log files takes several hours and does not happen right away.
The Exceptions
Of course, there are exceptions. By no means does AskEraser create a completely anonymous web browsing session. All other servers beyond Ask’s can still track visit information. In addition, some information is passed to Ask’s advertising partner, Google, so that the text ads displayed are connected to the search query.
At first glance, this seems to defeat the whole purpose of deletion of search activity. If Ask deletes it but has to pass all of that information to Google’s ad servers, what privacy is gained? The difference is that all of the information that Ask would gather is not necessarily passed on to the Google ad servers. Unfortunately, Ask cannot comment on the specifics of which data is transmitted to Google. Even so, it is obvious that it would need to pass the query itself to be able to get ads connected with the query keywords. It also seems unlikely that there would need to be any passing of IP address or cookie information. Until either Google or Ask is willing to release more information about what data is passed, users should probably assume that Google ad servers are gathering at least some level of data, but not necessarily more than that which would be gathered from visiting any site that displays Google ads.
Two other unusual exceptions that Ask mentions in its About AskEraser page (http://sp.ask.com/en/docs/about/askeraser.shtml) are for critical technical issues and for a legal request from law enforcement. In the event that search activity data is need "to solve a critical technical issue … search activity data may be retained for a longer period. At the time of technical resolution all search activity data of AskEraser users that was retained will be deleted." As to the legal requirements, "even when Ask Eraser is enabled, we may store your search activity data if so requested by law enforcement or legal authority pursuant to due process." Both of these situations could occur at any other website. At least Ask is upfront about stating the possible exceptions.
AskEraser has also been criticized by the Electronic Privacy Information Center and other privacy advocates (see www.epic.org/privacy/ask/EPIC_%20AskEraser.pdf) for several perceived flaws, which the groups see as correctable. The complaints include the use of a cookie to keep AskEraser enabled and the inclusion of a time stamp within that cookie. Also, in the exceptions for court-requested tracking, Ask should alert that user that AskEraser is not functioning.
One other cookie-related issue relates to Ask users outside of the U.S. and the U.K. Such users can go into the Ask preferences to specify that they wish to use Ask.com rather than another international version, but if they then turn on AskEraser, it will erase the cookie that remembers that preference. So, AskEraser does not appear to be easily available to those users until it is enabled on the other international sites.
The Privacy Alternative
The recent emphasis from several search engines on searcher privacy in the last few years is in contrast to the opposite recent emphasis on search histories and personalized search. Ask introduced MyJeeves (now known as MyStuff) in September 2004 (http://newsbreaks.infotoday.com/nbreader.asp?ArticleID=16364). Other search engines soon followed (http://newsbreaks.infotoday.com/nbreader.asp?ArticleID=16219) with a variety of search history features.
No numbers are available for the percentage of searchers who log in and enable the tracking of their search histories. Nor is Ask sharing any numbers of active AskEraser users. Based on the time that each system has been available, it is likely that many more searchers use Ask’s MyStuff than AskEraser. Crisp notes that Ask is "happy with the usage of MyStuff" and that it "know[s] that users who are using it really love it."
AskEraser and MyStuff demonstrate how a search engine can offer users options in both directions. Those who wish to have more information tracked and recorded for their own use can log in, enable MyStuff, and be able to view their own prior searchers. For those more concerned with privacy, "AskEraser is designed for that subset of our users who would like more control over their data," says Crisp.For searchers who have personal or business reasons to keep their searching as private as possible, AskEraser offers a tool to help keep such information out of search engine logs. While it does not yet offer full anonymity of searching, it is one more new attempt to give users more choices in protecting their online privacy.
Greg R. Notess is the internet columnist for ONLINE and the author of Teaching Web Search Skills (www.notess.com/teaching) and SearchEngineShowdown.com.
Email Greg R. Notess
I am posting this in full with a link because it is so interesting:
AskEraser: Privacy Potential by Greg R. Notess Posted On January 3, 2008
As web searching becomes ever more common in all aspects of our lives, the issue of our online privacy, or lack thereof, is an increasing concern. Searches and visits can be, and usually are, tracked and logged by any website. The information recorded can include a user’s IP address, the previous URL visited, the browser and operating system used, information in cookies set by that site, and search terms used. While none of this information can necessarily identify a specific user, the August 2006 release of AOL search data (see the NewsBreak at http://newsbreaks.infotoday.com/nbreader.asp?ArticleID=17374) showed that some personally identifiable information may be extracted from just a series of search queries.
On Dec. 11, 2007, Ask.com (http://www.ask.com/) introduced AskEraser as one way to help combat concerns with searching privacy. It gives searchers the ability to choose whether or not to preserve their own privacy when searching Ask. By default, it is not turned on, but the AskEraser link is featured in the upper right-hand corner of Ask pages. Users can click that link for the option to turn AskEraser on. AskEraser is available on the main U.S. Ask.com site and at the U.K. version (http://www.uk.ask.com/).
While most search engines (including Ask) have previously stated that they will not keep search log data for longer than 18 months, AskEraser gives users the ability to have their data deleted sooner than that. Patrick Crisp, a spokesman for Ask.com, said that "with AskEraser, we’re in a very real sense laying down a strong industry ‘marker’ that we expect others will follow."
With AskEraser turned on, all Ask cookies are deleted from the browser and one new cookie is set, which only tells Ask that AskEraser is enabled. "Within hours" of a search being run, AskEraser promises that the search activity will be deleted from its log files. Once that deletion has occurred, Ask no longer has any record of those specific searches. The information deleted includes the following:
The IP address of the computer being used
Cookies containing user ID or session ID information
The text of the search query
Older search activity from before the launch of AskEraser or from searches run without an enabled AskEraser will be retained in the logs for 18 months after the search was run.
This is not a simple process. Note that since the concept was first announced in July (www.irconnect.com/askj/pages/news_releases.html?d=123324), it took Ask months to implement it. Part of the difficulty is that logs are automatically recorded for all searches, and getting specific search activity deleted requires additional actions from the search company. This is also why the deletion from the log files takes several hours and does not happen right away.
The Exceptions
Of course, there are exceptions. By no means does AskEraser create a completely anonymous web browsing session. All other servers beyond Ask’s can still track visit information. In addition, some information is passed to Ask’s advertising partner, Google, so that the text ads displayed are connected to the search query.
At first glance, this seems to defeat the whole purpose of deletion of search activity. If Ask deletes it but has to pass all of that information to Google’s ad servers, what privacy is gained? The difference is that all of the information that Ask would gather is not necessarily passed on to the Google ad servers. Unfortunately, Ask cannot comment on the specifics of which data is transmitted to Google. Even so, it is obvious that it would need to pass the query itself to be able to get ads connected with the query keywords. It also seems unlikely that there would need to be any passing of IP address or cookie information. Until either Google or Ask is willing to release more information about what data is passed, users should probably assume that Google ad servers are gathering at least some level of data, but not necessarily more than that which would be gathered from visiting any site that displays Google ads.
Two other unusual exceptions that Ask mentions in its About AskEraser page (http://sp.ask.com/en/docs/about/askeraser.shtml) are for critical technical issues and for a legal request from law enforcement. In the event that search activity data is need "to solve a critical technical issue … search activity data may be retained for a longer period. At the time of technical resolution all search activity data of AskEraser users that was retained will be deleted." As to the legal requirements, "even when Ask Eraser is enabled, we may store your search activity data if so requested by law enforcement or legal authority pursuant to due process." Both of these situations could occur at any other website. At least Ask is upfront about stating the possible exceptions.
AskEraser has also been criticized by the Electronic Privacy Information Center and other privacy advocates (see www.epic.org/privacy/ask/EPIC_%20AskEraser.pdf) for several perceived flaws, which the groups see as correctable. The complaints include the use of a cookie to keep AskEraser enabled and the inclusion of a time stamp within that cookie. Also, in the exceptions for court-requested tracking, Ask should alert that user that AskEraser is not functioning.
One other cookie-related issue relates to Ask users outside of the U.S. and the U.K. Such users can go into the Ask preferences to specify that they wish to use Ask.com rather than another international version, but if they then turn on AskEraser, it will erase the cookie that remembers that preference. So, AskEraser does not appear to be easily available to those users until it is enabled on the other international sites.
The Privacy Alternative
The recent emphasis from several search engines on searcher privacy in the last few years is in contrast to the opposite recent emphasis on search histories and personalized search. Ask introduced MyJeeves (now known as MyStuff) in September 2004 (http://newsbreaks.infotoday.com/nbreader.asp?ArticleID=16364). Other search engines soon followed (http://newsbreaks.infotoday.com/nbreader.asp?ArticleID=16219) with a variety of search history features.
No numbers are available for the percentage of searchers who log in and enable the tracking of their search histories. Nor is Ask sharing any numbers of active AskEraser users. Based on the time that each system has been available, it is likely that many more searchers use Ask’s MyStuff than AskEraser. Crisp notes that Ask is "happy with the usage of MyStuff" and that it "know[s] that users who are using it really love it."
AskEraser and MyStuff demonstrate how a search engine can offer users options in both directions. Those who wish to have more information tracked and recorded for their own use can log in, enable MyStuff, and be able to view their own prior searchers. For those more concerned with privacy, "AskEraser is designed for that subset of our users who would like more control over their data," says Crisp.For searchers who have personal or business reasons to keep their searching as private as possible, AskEraser offers a tool to help keep such information out of search engine logs. While it does not yet offer full anonymity of searching, it is one more new attempt to give users more choices in protecting their online privacy.
Greg R. Notess is the internet columnist for ONLINE and the author of Teaching Web Search Skills (www.notess.com/teaching) and SearchEngineShowdown.com.
Clearly there is no such thing as total privacy today. I am not suspicious by nature so I do not fear people knowing my online activity. It is quite tedious. Between my occasional gaming, online reading of library topics, and visits to Amazon and Ebay, I would not be the fodder of scandal sheets. I do represent information however. I am a consumer of goods. I am an information consumer too. Google likes to follow trends, so I am a water molecule in the bucket, so to speak.
There are two basic kinds of search engines.
The first are web crawlers. Google is the most successful of these. Each time a site is visited your IP address is recorded along with recent history of others sites visited. Google has a series of programs that gather this information from sites and records the trends. It has a listing based on the sites use. The more the sight is visited the higher it is on the results list, or indexes. When you or I uses Google we type in search terms that are used to pull up files (sites, that is their URL'S).he Its kind of a hit or miss. It is a crude way of getting results at times however. Tens of thousands of sites are ordered according to their popularity, and based on the terms you put in.
The other big kind of search index is a directory that is based on human indexing. Squidoo is a good example of this, as well as Stumble Upon. A site owner enters a description of the site and its content. Listing means nothing. What is important is the description of it. Sites that are well designed and have excellent info that is updated on a regular basis often get reviews of it and thus better coverage.
There are also sites that use a combination of these techniques. This was very common in early search engines. For more information on search engines and how they work, I have provided some extra links below.
Privacy may be better thought of as a contract. When we log on through a provider we are agreeing to its terms of use. When we visit a site the same applies. By my way of thinking it is absurd to think that we can enjoy the same level of privacy that we do in our homes. When I was a kid I had a brother and sisters. The only privacy I ever got was in the bathroom. I also think that as Americans, we have a rather inflated concept of human rights at times. We live in what is defined as a democratic state. The truth, however is not so black and white. Like the privacy matter we have shades of rights, and with that many responsibilities. What attracts me most to public libraries (my chosen field) is that they depend on democratic principles to operate in the interest of the public. This of course does not mean we can offer our patrons everything they ask for. That is impossible. The same is true of the Internet.
As the article above suggests, we can afford levels of privacy, but invisibility is not one of them. Its in the contract. And that is the way it is. It is left for you decide, and live with the choices you make.
Any thoughts?
http://newsbreaks.infotoday.com/nbReader.asp?ArticleId=40526
http://searchenginewatch.com/showPage.html?page=2168031
http://computer.howstuffworks.com/search-engine.htm
http://www.webopedia.com/DidYouKnow/Internet/2003/HowWebSearchEnginesWork.asp
http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/TeachingLib/Guides/Internet/SearchEngines.html
Email Greg R. Notess
Me Read Big Book One Day
America’s Most Literate Cities, 2007
The Top Ten
1. Minneapolis, MN
2. Seattle, WA
3. St. Paul, MN
4. Denver, CO
5.Washington, DC
6. St. Louis, MO
7. San Francisco, CA
8. Atlanta, GA
9. Pittsburgh, PA
10. Boston, MA
Drawing from a variety of available data resources, the America’s Most Literate Cities study ranks the 69 largest cities (population 250,000 and above) in the United States. This study focuses on six key indicators of literacy: newspaper circulation, number of bookstores, library resources, periodical publishing resources, educational attainment, and Internet resources. The original study was published online in 2003 at the University of Wisconsin-Whitewater. A link to the 2004 rankings is provided here. The 2005 rankings were published online at Central Connecticut State University and are accessible here. The 2006 rankings are here.
Dr. John W. Miller, president of Central Connecticut State University, is the author of this study. Research for this edition of AMLC was conducted in collaboration with the Center for Public Policy and Social Research at CCSU
I must admit that my heart skipped a beat after reading this. How often have I sworn that I would put down that TV remote and pick up (from a growing stack of books near my bed) what I had lied about reading in conversation with someone. Yes, I know! Reading is for learning, not for impressing.
Then I paused. I considered the population of these cities. Larger cities such as New York, L.A. and my town (Chicago) are not even mentioned. Could it be that the numbers are so low, or where they even gathered? I then thought of how the sources of information were gathered, that is the industries. Data was gathered from Booksellers; Educational attainment; Internet Resources; Library Resources; Newspaper Circulation; and Periodical publications.
OK, most of these are sources which report sales. The only other is educational attainment.
OK say that again?
Methodology:
Selection of Cities for Inclusion Cities were selected based on their 2005 U.S. Census population figures. The study was limited to those cities with a population of 250,000 or larger.
OK
Newspaper Data:
For the newspaper database, the daily and Sunday circulation figures for the March 2006 reporting period from the Publisher’s Statements were obtained from the Audit Bureau of Circulation website (http://www.accessabc.com/).
Internet Data Figures
For the Internet accessibility database were obtained from Intel Corporation’s 3rd Annual "Most Unwired Cities" survey, which ranks the top 100 U.S. cities and regions for the greatest wireless Internet accessibility.
Magazines and Journals
Data Figures for this database were gathered from the web edition of the National Directory of Magazines (2004-2005) for magazines and the Standard Periodical Directory (2005) for journals through the www.MediaFinder.com website of Oxbridge Communications. Only those journals with a total circulation of 500 or more were included, and only those magazines with a total circulation of 2,500 or more were included.
Booksellers and Stores Data
For this database, information was gathered from the U.S. Census Bureau website (http://www.census.gov (2005 population)), as well as Yellow Pages, Inc. (http://www.yellowpagesinc.com (2006)) for information on retail, rare, and used booksellers. Also, the American Booksellers Association site (http://www.bookweb.org (2006)) was used for independent bookseller information.
Educational Attainment Data
For this database, information was gathered from the U.S. Census Bureau’s “American Factfinder” website (http://factfinder.census.gov), specifically from the results of the American Community Survey, 2005.
Political Affiliation and Literacy:
The data on 2004 presidential voter preferences was provided by Jason Alderman of The Bay Area Center for Voting Research in conjunction with the BACVR’s “The Most Conservative and Liberal Cities in the United States” study. According to Alderman, “The goal of this research was to rank America’s most liberal and conservative cities based on the voting returns of the 2004 United States presidential election.
And Finally:
Library Data:
Information regarding library staff per capita, volumes per capita, circulation per capita, and branches per capita were gleaned from National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) database, specifically the “Library Statistics Program” and its “Public Libraries Survey FY2004.”
So why are the most populous cities not in the top 10? Are we too busy to read? Too tired to drag the kids to the library? Are we on line but looking at porn, not reading the Op/Ed page of the New York Times, or downloading e-books at least? Are large numbers of children and poor still lagging behind despite the efforts of No Child Left Behind?
Yet what is the quality of reading materials in the reported "most literate" urban centers? I see people reading. However, is it enough? Shouldn't Mayor Daley of Chicago find this bothersome? After all, the city is pouring millions of tax dollars into the public library system here in Chicago. Are we doing the best we can to market the library then?
I just have so many damn questions about this. It disturbs me that Chicago, New York, and L.A. don't even make the bottom of the top 10 list.
From a related article in the Science Codex I find:
This is the fifth year the study has been conducted, and its author, Central Connecticut State University President Dr. Jack Miller, reports that his research also substantiates recent studies (such as the National Endowment for the Arts’ To Read or Not to Read) indicating that Americans are reading less and reading less well.
In an overview statement, Dr. Miller notes the growing concern for the decline in Americans’ reading habits and abilities. His review of five years of data shows that as Americans have become more educated, they are reading less: newspapers are disappearing and the numbers for bookstores per capita are decreasing. Yet there are bright spots in this disturbing trend: magazines have proliferated broadly, online reading has increased substantially, and libraries are holding their own.
Dr. Miller’s sources include U.S. Census data, audited newspaper circulation rates, and information on magazine publishing, educational attainment levels, library resources, and booksellers. The information is compared against population rates in each city to develop a per capita profile of the city’s long-term literacy practices and resources.
Yes, I am glad that libraries are stable, but the fact of quality and quantity is disturbing. This is very upsetting. Its a steady decline. Despite efforts are we losing the battle?
And what is the correlation between education levels and reading less? Shouldn't that be the opposite? And what is that saying about our education system? See more questions. By my reasoning, limited I confess, it would mean more reading if folks were more educated.
Could there be a misreading of the stats here?
Any thoughts?
http://www.ccsu.edu/AMLC07/Default.htm
http://www.ccsu.edu/AMLC06/Methodology.htm
http://www.sciencecodex.com/list_most_literate_cities_in_america
The Top Ten
1. Minneapolis, MN
2. Seattle, WA
3. St. Paul, MN
4. Denver, CO
5.Washington, DC
6. St. Louis, MO
7. San Francisco, CA
8. Atlanta, GA
9. Pittsburgh, PA
10. Boston, MA
Drawing from a variety of available data resources, the America’s Most Literate Cities study ranks the 69 largest cities (population 250,000 and above) in the United States. This study focuses on six key indicators of literacy: newspaper circulation, number of bookstores, library resources, periodical publishing resources, educational attainment, and Internet resources. The original study was published online in 2003 at the University of Wisconsin-Whitewater. A link to the 2004 rankings is provided here. The 2005 rankings were published online at Central Connecticut State University and are accessible here. The 2006 rankings are here.
Dr. John W. Miller, president of Central Connecticut State University, is the author of this study. Research for this edition of AMLC was conducted in collaboration with the Center for Public Policy and Social Research at CCSU
I must admit that my heart skipped a beat after reading this. How often have I sworn that I would put down that TV remote and pick up (from a growing stack of books near my bed) what I had lied about reading in conversation with someone. Yes, I know! Reading is for learning, not for impressing.
Then I paused. I considered the population of these cities. Larger cities such as New York, L.A. and my town (Chicago) are not even mentioned. Could it be that the numbers are so low, or where they even gathered? I then thought of how the sources of information were gathered, that is the industries. Data was gathered from Booksellers; Educational attainment; Internet Resources; Library Resources; Newspaper Circulation; and Periodical publications.
OK, most of these are sources which report sales. The only other is educational attainment.
OK say that again?
Methodology:
Selection of Cities for Inclusion Cities were selected based on their 2005 U.S. Census population figures. The study was limited to those cities with a population of 250,000 or larger.
OK
Newspaper Data:
For the newspaper database, the daily and Sunday circulation figures for the March 2006 reporting period from the Publisher’s Statements were obtained from the Audit Bureau of Circulation website (http://www.accessabc.com/).
Internet Data Figures
For the Internet accessibility database were obtained from Intel Corporation’s 3rd Annual "Most Unwired Cities" survey, which ranks the top 100 U.S. cities and regions for the greatest wireless Internet accessibility.
Magazines and Journals
Data Figures for this database were gathered from the web edition of the National Directory of Magazines (2004-2005) for magazines and the Standard Periodical Directory (2005) for journals through the www.MediaFinder.com website of Oxbridge Communications. Only those journals with a total circulation of 500 or more were included, and only those magazines with a total circulation of 2,500 or more were included.
Booksellers and Stores Data
For this database, information was gathered from the U.S. Census Bureau website (http://www.census.gov (2005 population)), as well as Yellow Pages, Inc. (http://www.yellowpagesinc.com (2006)) for information on retail, rare, and used booksellers. Also, the American Booksellers Association site (http://www.bookweb.org (2006)) was used for independent bookseller information.
Educational Attainment Data
For this database, information was gathered from the U.S. Census Bureau’s “American Factfinder” website (http://factfinder.census.gov), specifically from the results of the American Community Survey, 2005.
Political Affiliation and Literacy:
The data on 2004 presidential voter preferences was provided by Jason Alderman of The Bay Area Center for Voting Research in conjunction with the BACVR’s “The Most Conservative and Liberal Cities in the United States” study. According to Alderman, “The goal of this research was to rank America’s most liberal and conservative cities based on the voting returns of the 2004 United States presidential election.
And Finally:
Library Data:
Information regarding library staff per capita, volumes per capita, circulation per capita, and branches per capita were gleaned from National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) database, specifically the “Library Statistics Program” and its “Public Libraries Survey FY2004.”
So why are the most populous cities not in the top 10? Are we too busy to read? Too tired to drag the kids to the library? Are we on line but looking at porn, not reading the Op/Ed page of the New York Times, or downloading e-books at least? Are large numbers of children and poor still lagging behind despite the efforts of No Child Left Behind?
Yet what is the quality of reading materials in the reported "most literate" urban centers? I see people reading. However, is it enough? Shouldn't Mayor Daley of Chicago find this bothersome? After all, the city is pouring millions of tax dollars into the public library system here in Chicago. Are we doing the best we can to market the library then?
I just have so many damn questions about this. It disturbs me that Chicago, New York, and L.A. don't even make the bottom of the top 10 list.
From a related article in the Science Codex I find:
This is the fifth year the study has been conducted, and its author, Central Connecticut State University President Dr. Jack Miller, reports that his research also substantiates recent studies (such as the National Endowment for the Arts’ To Read or Not to Read) indicating that Americans are reading less and reading less well.
In an overview statement, Dr. Miller notes the growing concern for the decline in Americans’ reading habits and abilities. His review of five years of data shows that as Americans have become more educated, they are reading less: newspapers are disappearing and the numbers for bookstores per capita are decreasing. Yet there are bright spots in this disturbing trend: magazines have proliferated broadly, online reading has increased substantially, and libraries are holding their own.
Dr. Miller’s sources include U.S. Census data, audited newspaper circulation rates, and information on magazine publishing, educational attainment levels, library resources, and booksellers. The information is compared against population rates in each city to develop a per capita profile of the city’s long-term literacy practices and resources.
Yes, I am glad that libraries are stable, but the fact of quality and quantity is disturbing. This is very upsetting. Its a steady decline. Despite efforts are we losing the battle?
And what is the correlation between education levels and reading less? Shouldn't that be the opposite? And what is that saying about our education system? See more questions. By my reasoning, limited I confess, it would mean more reading if folks were more educated.
Could there be a misreading of the stats here?
Any thoughts?
http://www.ccsu.edu/AMLC07/Default.htm
http://www.ccsu.edu/AMLC06/Methodology.htm
http://www.sciencecodex.com/list_most_literate_cities_in_america
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
